(continued)...
As a radioactive emitter, DU also
presents a risk to the lungs.
Traditionally, radiation dosimetry
measures the extent of harm by
calculating the external radiation
absorbed by the tissues; the so-called
'absorbed' dose.(9)However because DU
dust is inhaled or ingested, it can
remain in the body tissues and emit
intensive radiation over a longer
period. This way it can cause a large
amount of damage over a relatively
small area, changing a person's genetic
codes and causing cancers. For these
reasons soldiers and civilians exposed
to DU risk developing lung cancers,
particularly if they are smokers
because their lungs will already have
been irritated.
There is much new evidence emerging
about the risks from so-called 'low
level' radiation and the damage it can
do to DNA. Considerable evidence has
been accumulated recently about the
'by-stander' effect, which shows that
irradiated cells pass on damage to
surrounding healthy cells. In this way
it is thought low-level radiation can
cause much greater damage than
would otherwise be expected.(10) Studies
have also shown that irradiated cells
pass on chromosomal aberrations to
their progeny so that non-irradiated
cells several generations, or cell
divisions later, will exhibit this
radiation-induced genomic instability
(RIGI).(11)
New evidence is also suggesting that
the chemical toxicity of DU and its
radioactivity reinforce each other in a
so-called 'synergistic effect', which
means it 'punches above its own
weight' in terms of the damage it can
do to cells. Alexandra Miller of the US
Armed Forces Radiobiology Research
Institute in the USA found in a study
in 2003 that when human bone cells
are exposed to DU, fragments break
away from the chromosomes and form
tiny rings of genetic material. This
damage was seen in new cells more
than a month after removal of the DU,
leading to an eight-fold increase in
genetic damage relative to that
expected.
It's not just in terms of increased risk
of cancer that DU DNA damage can affect health. It is also implicated
in causing a depressed immune
system, reproductive problems, and
birth defects. For example, a study of
US Gulf War veterans has found that
they are up to three times as likely to
have children with birth deformities
than fathers who had not served; and
that pregnancies result in significantly
higher rates of miscarriage.(12) A major
2004 Ministry of Defence-funded
survey study from the London School
of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has
found that babies whose fathers served
in the first Gulf War are 50 per cent
more likely to have physical
abnormalities. They also found a 40
per cent increased risk of
miscarriage among women
whose partners served in the
Gulf.
In Basra, in southern Iraq, there
have been striking reports for a
number of years about the rise
in local childhood cancers and
birth deformities seen there. The
findings of a leading Iraqi
epidemiologist, Dr Alim
Yacoub,13 were presented in New
York in June 2003 and suggest
there has been a more than five
fold increase in congenital
malformations and a
quadrupling of the incidence
rates of malignant diseases in
Basra.(14)
The Dutch Journal of Medical
Science reported the findings of
the Flemish eye doctor, Edward
De Sutter. He found 20 cases
out of 4000 births in Iraq of
babies with the phenomenon
anophthalmos: babies who have
been born with only one eye or
who are missing both eyes. The very
rare condition usually only affects 1
out of 50 million births.
The damaging effects to health that DU
weapons present are of particular
concern because of the likelihood of
civilians becoming exposed after
conflicts have ended. Children
especially are at risk because of
playing in and ingesting contaminated
soil and most of the health risks
discussed are of particular danger to
younger children.
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTAMINATION FROM DU
The release of DU into the environment
can pollute land and water for decades
to come. Its danger is not limited to
battlefield releases but will expose
present and future generations of
civilians to contaminated food and
water supplies. Environmental releases
of this sort can also be expected to
have negative effects on plant and
animal life although little is known
about this.
DU dust in the environment can
become resuspended through weather
conditions and human activity, such as
farming. Of particular worry is that
children are especially vulnerable to
receiving significant exposures through
playing on sites and ingestion of
contaminated soil by way of typical
hand-to-mouth activity.
DU can also contaminate soil through
corrosion from the original penetrator.
It is believed that 70-80% of all DU
penetrators used in the Gulf and the
Balkans remain buried in the soil. A
United Nations Environment
Programme study in Spring 2002
found that recovered penetrators had
decreased in mass by 10-15%.
Corrosion can feed uranium into
groundwater, where it can travel into
local water supplies. DU in soil can
also enter the food chain since it is
taken up by plants grown in it and by
animals used for food. A UNEP post-
conflict report on Bosnia and
Herzegovina has indeed found that DU
had also leached into local
groundwater. The same study found
that radioactive hotspots persisted at
some of the sites studied. Klaus
Toepfer, the Executive Director of
UNEP, said at the time, "Seven years
after the conflict, DU still remains an
environmental concern and, therefore,
it is vital that we have the scientific
facts, based upon which we can give
clear recommendations on how to
minimise any risk".
The British and US militaries have
demonstrated extreme irresponsibility
in releasing DU into the environment,
using it without proper monitoring or
information about the risks it poses
even in their own countries. In
January 2003, the US Navy admitted
routinely firing DU from its Phalanx
guns in prime fishing waters off the
coast of Washington state since 1977.
At the Dundrennan testsite in
Scotland around 30 tonnes of DU
rounds have been fired into the Solway
Firth. Only one has ever been
retrieved, when it was found in a
fisherman's net.
Both governments have been equally
callous in their disregard concerning
the long term risk to civilians in
countries where they have used DU.
DU AND THE MILITARY
DU is used in a variety of military
applications. It is attractive to the
military, governments and the nuclear
industry for three main reasons.
Firstly, as mentioned earlier, it is in
cheap and plentiful supply and solves
the problem of storage and monitoring.
Secondly, it is a very effective
battlefield weapon because its high
density and self-sharpening qualities
enable it to penetrate hard targets with
ease. Thirdly, DU is pyrophoric, which
means it burns on impact, enhancing
its ability to destroy enemy targets.
The UK test firing of DU began at the
Eskmeals range in Cumbria in the
early 1960s. Testing continues today
at Dundrennan, in Southern Scotland,
most recently before the 2003 attack
on Iraq. DU is now used in two types of
ammunition in the British armed
forces: the 120 mm anti-tank rounds
(CHARM 3), which is fired by the
Army's Challenger tanks and 20mm
rounds used by the Royal Navy's
Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (a
missile defence system). The Phalanx
system was developed by the US Navy
and is used by both the Australian and
British Navies. In 1993, a leaked
Pentagon report revealed how the use
of DU could lead to increased cancer
risks: this leak caused the US
manufacturers to switch to tungsten
alternatives. Because of this the Royal
Navy has been forced to convert its
replacement ammunition to tungsten
too, although it still has stockpiles of
DU.
The US military uses DU mainly for its
Abrahams tanks and A10 warplanes,
although it is also used in its Bradley
fighting vehicles, AV-8B Harrier
aircraft, Super Cobra helicopter and its
Navy Phalanx system. It is also used by
the US military for a variety of other
applications including bombshells,
tank armour plating, aircraft ballast
and anti-personnel mines. Although
the US and UK militaries are the only
countries who have been properly
documented as using DU weapons,
they are known to be held by at least
seventeen other countries including:
Australia, Bahrain, France, Greece,
Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Pakistan,
Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea,
Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, and the
United Arab Emirates.
The testing of DU weapons has caused
considerable contamination at test
sites across the world. At Dundrennan,
in Scotland, for example, a 2004
Ministry of Defence report revealed
how, since 1982 over 90 shells had
either been misfired or had
malfunctioned and scattered fragments
of DU across the ground. Despite
searches, some of these fragments
have never been recovered.
Contamination levels were high in
these areas, which have had to be
fenced off. At Okinawa in Japan, and
Vieques, an island of Puerto Rico, the
US military used DU weapons without
the appropriate licences and without
informing their respective governments
or local populations. In the US, the
Army is attempting to walk away from
its responsibilities to decontaminate
former test sites, such as Picatinny
Arsenal in New Jersey and Jefferson
Proving Ground in Indiana.
It is now clear that the
military have known the risks of
depleted uranium but failed to provide
safety instructions to soldiers in both
the 1991 Gulf Wars and the Balkan
conflicts. A study prepared for the US
Army in July 1990, a month before
Iraq invaded Kuwait, says:
"The health risks associated with
internal & external DU exposure during
combat conditions are certainly far less
than other combat-related risks.
Following combat, however, the
condition of the battlefield and the long-term
health risks to natives & combat
veterans may become issues in the
acceptability of the continued use of
DU."
Furthermore, a leaked 1993 document
from the US Army Surgeon General's
office said, "When soldiers inhale or
ingest DU dust they incur a potential
increase in cancer risk ... that increase
can be quantified in terms of projected
days of life loss."
DU IN IRAQ
The 1991 Gulf War saw the first
verified use of DU weapons. Around
320 tonnes of DU in weapons were
used in the war, of which about 1
tonne was used by the UK military.
According to data from the US
Department of Defense, tens or
hundreds of thousands of US military
personnel could have been exposed to
DU. Both the US and UK Governments
refused any responsibility for
decontamination and both refused to
study the exposure rates or after-effects
of this DU use. After a few
years, evidence began to emerge from
Iraq about the increasing incidence of
cancer and birth deformities in the
south of the country. After heavy US
lobbying in November 2001 the UN
General Assembly voted down an Iraqi
proposal that the UN study the effects
of the DU used there.
In the 2003 attack on Iraq, the US and
UK militaries used DU again despite
the lack of reliable data on the effects
of using it in Iraq 12 years previously.
The British Government has admitted
using 1.9 tonnes of DU. Even though
this is only a tiny proportion of all DU
used in Iraq, it is double the amount
used in 1991. The US authorities have
still not said how much has been used,
although an initial Pentagon source
revealed 75 tons of DU may remain in
Iraq from A-10 planes alone.
The implications for Iraqi civilians are
very alarming. Unlike the first Gulf
War, which was largely confined to
desert areas, much of the DU use has
been in built-up, heavily populated
areas. The US Government has refused
any cleanup of DU in Iraq, clinging to
the statement that it has no link with
ill health, while the British
Government has for the first time
admitted it does have a responsibility
but says it is low on their list of
priorities.
OTHER COUNTRIES
CONTAMINATED BY DU
BOSNIA 1994-1995
DU rounds were used in Bosnia by US
A-20 warplanes under the auspices of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
(NATO). Around 10,800 DU rounds, or
3 tonnes, were used in Bosnia.
However NATO always denied DU had
been used until 2000, 6 years after the
attacks, when media reports began to
emerge. For all this time no cleanups
or public awareness campaigns could
be run, leading to unnecessary civilian
exposures. The UNEP report,1
mentioned earlier, and released in
March 2003, found DU contamination
of drinking water and radioactive
'hotspots'. UNEP recommended
ongoing monitoring of drinking water,
cleanup of DU sites, cleaning of
contaminated buildings and the
release by NATO of all DU-attack
coordinates.
KOSOVO, YUGOSLAVIA -
1999
US A-10 aircraft fired around 31,300
rounds of DU, or 9 tons of DU in
areas of Kosovo, Serbia and
Montenegro during NATO action there
in 1999. Partial information about the
use of DU was released a year after the
war when UN Secretary General
KofiAnnan sent a letter requesting the
information to NATO Secretary General
Lord George Robertson. An analysis in
a UNEP Post-Conflict field study of
recovered DU shells, published in
March 2001, found that some of the
shells were made with recycled
uranium (that is, with uranium that
had been through a nuclear reactor)
and were contaminated with
plutonium. The study did not find
widespread contamination but did find
evidence of airborne movement of DU
dust. It also found localised points of
concentrated contamination showing
U-238 at 10,000 times normal
background levels. The study
recommended decontamination,
removal of penetrators and drinking
water monitoring. A separate report
published by UNEP on DU
contamination in Serbia and
Montenegro found "widespread, but
low-level DU contamination, airborne
DU particles" and that "DU dust was
widely dispersed into the
environment."
As well as official reports there has
been widespread anecdotal evidence of
so-called 'Balkans syndrome' among
both soldiers deployed in the region
and civilian populations. Symptoms are
similar sounding to "Gulf War
Syndrome" with heightened levels of
leukaemia, respiratory and immune
system illnesses. By mid-2004 twenty-seven
Italian soldiers have died of
symptoms thought to be linked to DU
exposure. A court in Rome ordered the
Italian Ministry of Defence to
compensate the family of Stefano
Melone, a soldier who died of a
malignant vascular tumour. According
to the court, Mr Melone's death was
"due to exposure to radioactive and
carcinogen substances" on missions in
the Balkans.
Tension was caused within NATO as
member countries were not warned
that their soldiers would be entering
DU contaminated zones.
AFGHANISTAN 2001-
2004
There is some evidence that DU has
been used in Afghanistan, although
this has never been confirmed
officially. For example, US A-10s and
Harrier aircraft, which both use DU
ammunition, are known to have been
active in the region. Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld has said that the US
has found radioactivity indicating DU
use by the Taliban or Al-Qaeda.
Geneva Convention Rules (to which US and UK are signees)
- The limitation of unnecessary human
suffering [Art.35.2]
- The limitation of damage to the
environment [Art. 35.3 and 55.1]
- It is prohibited to
employ weapons, projectiles and
material and methods of warfare
of a nature to cause superfluous
injury or unnecessary suffering [Art. 35.3]
- It is prohibited to
employ methods or means of
warfare which are intended, or
may be expected, to cause
widespread, long-term and
severe damage to the natural
environment. [Art. 35.2]
- In order to ensure respect for
and protection of the civilian
population and civilian objects,
the Parties to the conflict shall
at all times distinguish between
the civilian population and
combatants and between
civilian objects and military
objectives and accordingly shall
direct their operations only
against military objectives. [Art. 48]
- Indiscriminate attacks
are prohibited. Indiscriminate
attacks are:
(a) those which are not directed at
a specific military objective;
(b) those which employ a
method or means of combat which
cannot be directed at a specific
military objective; or
(c) those which employ a
method or means of combat
the effects of which cannot be
limited as required by this
Protocol; and consequently,
in each such case, are of a
nature to strike military objectives
and civilians or
civilian objects without distinction. [Art.51.4]
- Care shall be taken
in warfare to protect the
natural environment against
widespread, long-term and
severe damage. This protection
includes a prohibition of the
use of methods or means of
warfare which are intended or may
be expected to cause such damage
to the natural environment and
thereby to prejudice the health or
survival of the population. [Art. 55.1]
Update: February 20, 2006
UK radiation jump blamed on Iraq shells
Mark Gould and Jon Ungoed-Thomas [Sunday Times Online]
RADIATION detectors in Britain recorded a fourfold increase in uranium levels in the atmosphere after the ³shock and awe² bombing campaign against Iraq, according to a report.
Environmental scientists who uncovered the figures through freedom of information laws say it is evidence that depleted uranium from the shells was carried by wind currents to Britain.
Government officials, however, say the sharp rise in uranium detected by radiation monitors in Berkshire was a coincidence and probably came from local sources.
The results from testing stations at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) in Aldermaston and four other stations within a 10-mile radius were obtained by Chris Busby, of Liverpool University¹s department of human anatomy and cell biology.
Each detector recorded a significant rise in uranium levels during the Gulf war bombing campaign in March 2003. The reading from a park in Reading was high enough for the Environment Agency to be alerted.
Busby, who has advised the government on radiation and is a founder of Green Audit, the environmental consultancy, believes "uranium aerosols" from Iraq were widely dispersed in the atmosphere and blown across Europe.
"This research shows that rather than remaining near the target as claimed by the military, depleted uranium weapons contaminate both locals and whole populations hundreds to thousands of miles away," he said.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) countered that it was "unfeasible" depleted uranium could have travelled so far. Radiation experts also said that other environmental sources were more likely to blame.
The "shock and awe" campaign was one of the most devastating assaults in modern warfare. In the first 24-hour period more than 1,500 bombs and missiles were dropped on Baghdad.
During the conflict A10 'tankbuster' planes ‹ which use munitions containing depleted uranium ‹ fired 300,000 rounds. The substance ‹ dubbed a {silver bullet{ because of its ability to pierce heavy tank armour ‹ is controversial because of its potential effect on human health. Critics say it is chemically toxic and can cause cancer, and Iraqi doctors reported a marked rise in cancer cases after it was used in the first Gulf conflict.
The American and British governments say depleted uranium is relatively harmless, however. The Royal Society, the UK¹s academy of science, has also said the risk from depleted uranium is "very low" for soldiers and people in a conflict zone.
Busby's report shows that within nine days of the start of the Iraq war on March 19, 2003, higher levels of uranium were picked up on five sites in Berkshire. On two occasions, levels exceeded the threshold at which the Environment Agency must be informed, though within safety limits. The report says weather conditions over the war period showed a consistent flow of air from Iraq northwards.
Brian Spratt, who chaired the Royal Society's report, cast doubt on depleted uranium as a source but said it could have come from natural uranium in the massive amounts of soil kicked up by shock and awe.
Other experts said local environmental sources, such as a power station, were more likely at fault. The Environment Agency said detectors at other sites did not record a similar increase, which suggested a local source.
A MoD spokesman said the uranium was of a "natural origin" and there was no evidence that depleted uranium had reached Britain from Iraq.
Spreading Cancer
Depleted uranium turns Bush's lies into high-tech horror
By ROBERT C. KOEHLER
Tribune Media Services
June 29, 2006
The unending game of "pretend" that the U.S. media allow George Bush to play on the global stage, so often letting his lying utterances hang suspended, unchallenged, in the middle of the story, as though they were plausible -- as though a class of third-graders couldn¹t demolish them with a few innocent questions -- feels like the journalistic equivalent of waterboarding. Gasp! Some truth, please!
I suggest the prez has forfeited the right to command a headline, or half a story, or an uninterrupted quote: ". . . we'll defend ourselves, but at the same time we¹re actively working with our partners to spread peace and democracy," he said last week in Austria.
Surely "spreading democracy" should no longer be allowed to appear in print, between now and 2008, unless accompanied by a parenthetical clarification ("not true," stated as profanely as local standards allow). And that, of course, would only be the media's first step back into integrity with the public.
The occupation of Iraq, the occupation of Afghanistan, the entire war (to promote) terror . . . please, please, can these no longer be trotted out in consequence-free abstraction, but as the high-tech malevolence they are, actively continuing the incalculable devastation of countries and their populations?
The bodies keep piling up, the toxic horrors spread. Hasn't anyone in this place ever heard of depleted uranium? Is the health crisis in Iraq and, indeed, throughout the Middle East and Central Asia, not to mention Kosovo and among returning vets for the last four American wars, somehow irrelevant to "the course" we're asked to stay?
"Two strange phenomena have come about in Basra which I have never seen before. The first is double and triple cancers in one patient. For example, leukemia and cancer of the stomach. We had one patient with two cancers -- one in his stomach and kidney. Months later, primary cancer was developing in his other kidney -- he had three different cancer types. The second is the clustering of cancer in families. We have 58 families here with more than one person affected by cancer. . . . My wife has nine members of her family with cancer."
This is Dr. Jawad Al-Ali, director of the oncology center at the largest hospital in Basra, speaking in 2003 at a peace conference in Japan. Why is it that only peace activists are able to hear people like this? Why hasn't he been asked to testify before Congress as its members debate the future of this war and the next?
"Children in particular are susceptible to DU poisoning," he went on. "They have a much higher absorption rate as their blood is being used to build and nourish their bones and they have a lot of soft tissues. Bone cancer and leukemia used to be diseases affecting them the most. However, cancer of the lymph system, which can develop anywhere on the body and has rarely been seen before the age of 12, is now also common."
Depleted uranium -- DU -- is the Defense Establishment euphemism for U-238, a byproduct of the uranium enrichment process and the ultimate dirty weapon material. It's almost twice as dense as lead, catches fire when launched and explodes on impact into microscopically fine particles, or "nano-particles," which are easily inhaled or absorbed through the skin; it's also radioactive, with a half-life of 4.468 billion years.
And we make bombs and bullets out of it ‹ it's the ultimate penetrating weapon. We dropped at least 300 tons of it on Iraq during Gulf War I (the first time it was used in combat) and created Gulf War Syndrome. This time around, the estimated DU use on defenseless Iraq is 1,700 tons, far more of it in major population centers. Remember shock and awe? We were pounding Baghdad, in those triumphant early days, with low-grade nuclear weapons, raining down cancer, neurological disorders, birth defects and much, much more on the people we claimed to be liberating. We weren't spreading democracy, we were altering the human genome.
As we "protected ourselves," in the words of the president, from Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction, we opened our own arsenal of WMD on them, contaminating the country's soil and polluting its air -- indeed, unleashing a nuclear dust into the troposphere and contaminating the whole world.
"We used to think (DU) traveled up to a hundred miles," Chris Busby told me. Busby, a chemical physicist and member of the British government's radiation risk committee, as well as the founder of the European Committee of Radiation Risk, has monitored air quality in Great Britain. Based on these findings, "It looks like it goes quite around the planet," he said.
While Bush mouths ironic whoppers -- "We will be standing with the people of Afghanistan and Iraq until their hopes for freedom and liberty are fulfilled," he told the U.N. General Assembly a while back -- his actions pass, in the words of former Livermore Labs scientist Leuren Moret, "a death sentence on the Middle East and Central Asia."
A war crime of unprecedented dimension is unfolding as we avert our eyes. Perhaps it's simply too big to see, or to grasp, so we lull ourselves into the half-belief that the powers that be know what they're doing and it will all turn out for the best. Meanwhile, the contagion spreads, the children die, the planet becomes uninhabitable.
Italian Soldiers Dying Because of DU
January 2007
Italian soldiers are still dying following exposure to depleted uranium in the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo, their relatives say.
Troops who served during the wars in the 1990s believe they have contracted cancer and other serious illnesses from extended exposure to the munitions.
The US says it fired around 40,000 depleted uranium rounds during the Bosnian and Kosovo conflicts.
A pressure group says 50 veterans have died and another 200 are seriously ill.
Depleted uranium is used on the tips of bullets and shells. Because of its density it can pierce the armour plating on tanks.
But when it explodes it often leaves a footprint of chemically poisonous and radioactive dust.
The Italians who served in Bosnia and Kosovo were involved in the clear-up of battlefields and came into close contact with exploded ammunition.
Children with disabilities
The association representing the soldiers, known as Anavafaf, says many of those who have died or are ill have contracted cancer.
In 2002 the Italian defence ministry published a report compiled by independent scientists which found a higher than average number of servicemen were suffering from cancer.
It said there was an excessive number of Hodgkin's disease victims among Italian Balkan peacekeepers.
A number of children fathered by the soldiers have been born with disabilities.
There are similar reports from soldiers' associations in Belgium, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands.
Both the US and Britain acknowledge the dust from depleted uranium can be dangerous if inhaled but they insist the danger is short-lived and localised.
For more updated stories, see Article in Truthout Back to Viewzone || Body Mind Spirit
|
| |