There have long been allegations that the rapid spread of AIDS, both in Africa and in the United States, was originally precipitated by various vaccine programs. A new investigation shows conclusively that HIV infection among San Francisco gay men was a result of contaminated vaccines.

If this contamination was intentional, it would represent the worst assault in American history, and probably in human history. The truth must be determined, and justice must be done.

There is strong reason to believe that the HIV contamination of the vaccines was intentional. Studies were performed to determine whether HIV could have accidentally survived the vaccine production methods. These studies showed that all traces of HIV would have been easily destroyed, without human intervention.

It does not matter whether HIV is a product of nature, or has long existed. Anthrax is also natural, and has long existed. It can, and has, also been turned into a weapon and used intentionally. The same may be true of HIV.

The "Ames" strain of anthrax, used in recent terror assaults, is a product of U.S. military labs. It may have been stolen by terrorists, or perhaps the development program was infiltrated by a mole working for some hostile foreign power.

Whether it was the work of terrorists, or hate groups, or renegades within our own government, needs to be investigated.

Demonstrating the link of HIV to the experimental vaccines is a very commonplace type of statistical analysis. It is the same principle as determining whether a vaccine is working, or produces sides effects. Two professors specializing in statistics have confirmed the validity of the methodology in this study. The full analysis can be viewed at:

All concerned persons should try to learn about this issue, and help to raise a voice.


This statistical study concerns what is probably one of the most significant and overlooked issues of our time. It demonstrates proof of a strong link between the U.S. outbreak of AIDS, and hepatitis studies that were performed on gay males, starting in the late 1970s. The analysis refutes explanations that attribute the connection simply to sexual risk behavior on the part of the study participants.

The analysis also presents evidence suggesting that HIV infections occurring in the studies were more likely to have been intentional rather than accidental. This raises the question of whether the men in these studies might have been used as guinea pigs for covert experimentation, or whether a sexually-transmitted epidemic might have been deliberately induced, as a means to rid society of "undesirables". Regardless of whether the virus itself came into existence naturally, its initial spread was clearly unnatural.

The methodology used in this document is highly similar to that which is typically used to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. The analysis evaluates differences in infection rates between a suitable control group, versus a vaccine test group.

In the first two years of the epidemic in San Francisco, between 50 and 60 percent of the earliest known AIDS cases were from persons involved in the hepatitis studies. A goal of this analysis is to calculate specific probabilities for these and other similar figures. It demonstrates that such figures cannot credibly be attributed merely to chance, or to differences in risk behaviors.

Odds of the disproportionate levels of HIV infection among men in the vaccine trial, relative to other men of similar risk behaviors, are shown to be as little as 1 in a trillion.

A statistical link exists not only to experimental vaccines, but also simply to the fact of participation in the hepatitis studies, such as simply to have blood drawn for purposes of monitoring hepatitis prevalence. Few logical or benign possibilities exist to explain why there should be such a connection, yet it exists. Odds against the higher initial rate of AIDS among study participants was as little as 1 in 300,000, when compared to men of equal or higher risk.

Various epidemiological anomalies also suggest that an artificial, simultaneous, mass-infection would have been necessary in order to produce the type of explosion in HIV that was observed in the early 1980s. Full-blown AIDS should have been evident many years earlier, before HIV was nearly so widespread Thousands of infections would have been necessary to fuel the levels of HIV growth that were observed, during years in which no retroactive evidence of HIV exists.

These anomalies are analyzed using computer modeling software.

Table of Contents